|
Rework for Pad and Component Mismatch
Well, how's this for a mouthful, "IPC-J-STD-001D, Requirements for Soldered Electrical and Electronic Assemblies, Table 7-4, Dimensional Criteria- Chip Components - Rectangular or Square End Components - 1, 3 or 5". In this case it's specifically, minimum end solder joint width on a rectangular chip cap. Of course that's not to mention "IPC-A-610D, 8.2.2.9 ..." Which basically deals with the same subject. It's a wonder pad to part size mismatch doesn't happen more often, considering the thousands and thousands of opportunities on assemblies.
When it does happen, it's a big problem. Try as hard as we might to read a solution into the IPC specs, it's not always simple. In Figures 1 and 2 you can see the results of a part/pad mismatch. If the pad was the proper width, the fix would have been relatively simple; just create a small separation in the middle of the two ends. Unfortunately the single pad was too narrow.
After multiple measurements, component placements, comparisons and conversations, it was decided that these pads would not do as they were. Over thirty locations per board needed a fix.
Our procedure 4.7.2 Surface Mount Pad Repair, Film Adhesive Method outlines the basic process for conducting this repair. In this case the connecting conductors varied, so many of the pads had to be cut to size. It was quite a project to prepare and bond over 60 pads. Figure 3 shows a row of un-repaired pads. Figure 4 shows the same row with a new set of pads. Figure 5 shows a close up of a component placed on new pads. The customer was able to get the board up and functioning. Another case solved. Several members of the Circuit Technology Center team contributed to this feature story. |
Related Information
|





